Challenges to Territorial Jurisdiction Determination in Smuggling Cases

نویسندگان

چکیده

The paper examines the issue of determining limits courts’ jurisdiction in course consideration criminal cases related to smuggling, and presence procedural factors influencing determination territorial established by articles 32, 35 Code Criminal Procedure Russian Federation. considers practice Trans-Baikal Territory courts, reveals need for legislative resolution controversial issues determine smuggling. author makes proposals gives judgments on additional clarifications Supreme Court Federation rules applying Art. 32 It is smuggling that cause a certain difficulty establishing jurisdiction. due totality conditions these norms, given various places crimes committed, completion acts their severity. Difficulties correct definition such circumstances affect «wandering» this category between along with exercise rights participants process appeal against actions courts connection disputed subjects proper contentious one degree or another may delay reasonable timeframes provided Article 6.1 when considering even before start trial court merits. In some cases, impact expiration deadlines bringing perpetrators not ruled out liability terms detention smugglers. foregoing also applies law improvement field combating

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Revisiting Extraterritorial Jurisdiction: A Territorial Justification for Extraterritorial Jurisdiction under the European Convention

European participation in controversial aspects of the ‘war on terror’ has transformed the question of the extraterritorial scope of the European Convention on Human Rights from abstract doctrine into a question with singularly pressing political and legal ramifications.doctrine into a question with singularly pressing political and legal ramifications. Yet the European Court of Human Rights ha...

متن کامل

Nis Nuclear Smuggling since 1995: a Lull in Significant Cases?

Between 1992 and 1994, there were at least seven unambiguous cases of diversion and recovery of weapons-usable nuclear material that appeared to be linked to the former Soviet Union. The Western nonproliferation community has referred to these as “significant cases” because they provided unequivocal evidence that it was possible for highly enriched uranium (HEU) and plutonium, the essential ing...

متن کامل

Money Laundering and Bulk Cash Smuggling: Challenges for the U

By Douglas Farah enior Fellow nternational Assessment and Strategy Center S I The Scope of the Problem Bulk cash smuggling across the U.S.‐Mexico border cannot be viewed in isolation. Rather, the process of illegally moving large quantities of dollars across the border must be viewed as part of the movements in a larger pipeline that flows across the northern tier of South America, through Ce...

متن کامل

The Indeterminacy of an Emergency: Challenges to Criminal Jurisdiction in Constitutional Democracy

In this contribution I address the type of emergency that threatens a state’s monopoly of violence, meaning that the state’s competence to provide citizens with elementary security is challenged. The question is, whether actions taken by the state to ward off these threats (should) fall within the ambit of the criminal law. A central problem is the indeterminacy that is inherent in the state of...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Aktual?nye problemy rossijskogo prava

سال: 2023

ISSN: ['1994-1471']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2023.147.2.160-170